From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-09-02 13:20:31
--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
[...]
> > I think construct/destroy can be implemented as non-customizable
> > static functions in boost just for convinence.
>
> I think the word "static" is not what you meant, and is what led me
> to challenge the suggestion.
I used word 'static' because I assumed that construct/destroy
functions would be implemented in some 'memory' data type
(just to qualify it).
struct memory
{
static template< typename A >
typename A::pointer construct( A& a, size_t n ) {...}
static template< typename A >
void destroy( typename A::pointer ) {...}
};
Eugene
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com