From: Keith Burton (kb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-30 07:58:11
I consider single storage vital in my intended uses of variant.
I would slightly prefer option 1 ( void ) over option 2 ( boost::empty )
but not at the expense of availability of the implementation of
Microsoft compilers.
Option 3 would definitely not get my vote.
Keith Burton
boost-bounces_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Eric Friedman wrote:
> [snip]
>> ...there are alternative (albeit less elegant) options. [snip]
>
> I'd like to present what are IMO the most viable options for manually
> disabling variant's double storage.
[ snip ]