From: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-27 11:08:05
Hi,
Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 8:21:59 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> The implementation is fine, AFAICT. The only problem with me is the comment:
> I couldn't understand it for the first time because "none *it" sounded
> confusing. Maybe "*it is never equal to u" is better?
You're right, my english is terrible.
> BTW, if you could sumbit unified diff instead of new implementation, that
> would be nice. If that's not convenient for you, no problem. I can apply
> the thange anyway.
Patch is attached.
-- Regards, Janusz