From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-26 11:11:24
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I guess there is no equivalent to memcpy_moveable: but it looks rather
>> dangerous, what state is the original object left in afterwards etc?
>
> None. There is no original object after the move, only raw storage.
...which is a different meaning from move in our move proposal
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com