From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-21 12:49:13
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:u8ypn68n5.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> [...]
> Pretty much. See
> http://www.boost-consulting.com/boost/more/license_info.html or
> boost/more/license_info.html in your CVS tree.
Does the license itself have a copyright which must be acknowledged?
I guess it seems like worrying about a license for a license enters
into a world of recursive absurdity that only a lawyer would dare to
enter, but mainly I'm wondering if this part:
Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
must appear with the rest of the license or not. It seems odd to have
a license version and date appear with the license (first time I've seen
it, anyway), but if that is the proper form, so be it.
Dave