From: Russell Hind (rhind_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-06 08:42:59
This is just what I would like to see in boost. I have created a
duplicate set of headers for boost (same names, same structure but in
boost_wrappers which do this and include the original header between the
push and pop). We had a discussion about this a while back and I am all
for it, but people seemed against it. I'll try and find a link to the
discussion.
Thanks
Russell
John Maddock wrote:
>>Does regex address the issue of alignment and calling convention etc and
>>other options (in BCB, treat enums as ints is a good one to screw up
>>libraries) by wrapping the headers in push/pop option statements?
>
>
> Yes:
>
> #ifdef __BORLANDC__
> # pragma option push -a8 -b -Vx -Ve -pc -w-8027
> #endif
>
> // code here....
>
> #ifdef __BORLANDC__
> # pragma option pop
> #endif
>
> We should standardize this boost-wide really in some kind of prefix/suffix
> header.
>
> John.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>