From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-29 11:46:36
Juanma Barranquero <jmbarranquero_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:51:27 -0400
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I don't see what that has to do with the contradiction I quoted.
>> First they say that GCCs newer than 2.95.x will be slower, then later
>> they say that the fastest GCC they can find is 3.1.
>
> Well, OK. But, after reading the bit I quoted, I think we can assume
> they're not self-contradictory, just sloppy writers :)
>
>> Well, and EH, probably.
>
> Why?
Because MSVC doesn't have a zero-runtime-overhead-unless-throwing EH
model, while GCC does. Is it disabled for Cygwin GCC? I never
bothered to check.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com