From: Daniel Spangenberg (dsp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-21 04:29:03
John Torjo schrieb:
> Exactly! Don't do anything! But in order not to do anything, I need to know
> whether the compiler support a FUNCTION-like macro or not.
>
> Otherwise, I won't know (and assume it has), and print to the user something
> like:
>
> function= '(unknown)'.
>
> Which would you prefer?
I although think, that some additional detection macro, a la
BOOST_HAS_NO_CURRENT_FUNCTION_AVAILABLE
would be useful and consistent to other deficiency flags already existing
in the Boost library.
Just my personal 0.02 EURO
Daniel