From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-12 14:16:45
Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> writes:
> IMO we should just stop using 'void_' for internal purposes and give it
> up to users :).
I am still unsure about 'void_' being better than 'nil' or
'null'.... Users already have a type, 'void', which means void.
There's no correspondence between void_ and void the way there is
between bool_ and bool.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com