From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-19 10:54:49
Yep. Anyway, VC7.1 (VS 2003) is a joy to use with Spirit.
We've tried our best to make Spirit work with VC6. See:
http://spirit.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?page=Compiler+Table
Most of the modules, except the ones that use Phoenix,
works with VC6 and 7. Notice though how VC7.1 scores!
--
Joel de Guzman
joel at boost-consulting.com
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
Michael Walter wrote:
> Visual C++ 6.0 doesn't support partial template specialization.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
>> On Behalf Of DudeSan
>> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:27 PM
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: [boost] A problem concerning msvc++ and
> boost::spirit::phoenix
>>
>> While I was playing around with spirit yesterday, I stumbled on
>> something nasty. I'm not sure if this is the right place to report
> this
>> but I'll post it here anyway :)
>>
>> I found a calculator example
>>
> (http://www.oreillynet.com/network/2003/05/06/examples/calculatorexample
>> .html) which includes <boost/spirit/phoenix/tuples.hpp> (not directly
>> but via boost/spirit/phoenix/binders.hpp).
>>
>> Here I found the first occurrence; it seems that the Visual C++ 6.0
>> compiler doesn't see the difference between
>>
>> template <typename T>
>> struct access {
>>
>> typedef const T& ctype;
>> typedef T& type;
>> };
>>
>> and
>>
>> template <typename T>
>> struct access<T&> {
>>
>> typedef T& ctype;
>> typedef T& type;
>> };
>>
>> It reports "template class has already been defined as a non-template
>> class", so it seems that 'template <typename T> struct access' isn't
>> being recognized as a template class.