From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-04 18:07:33
Nicolas Fleury wrote:
[...]
> What is the paper you have in mind to justify the absence of semaphores?
> I would like very much to understand and be convinced. It would also
> be nice if the #10 of the FAQ would point to this paper.
It can be found here:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0387954015/104-6312782-0737542
regards,
alexander.
-- http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D58D3BC.6D42748B%40web.de