From: Trevor Taylor (xju_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-28 04:09:55
> Are you planning to implement a "real" pthread_refcount_t for, say, Windows
> and Linux/x86?
Who? Me?
No, I no nothing about any of this (as I've just demonstrated), it just
seemed from your "Maybe one day we'll have a pthread_refcount_t"
statement that things could be improved if one existed - so I was
suggesting an alternative way to get the same effect as a
pthread_refcount_t.
I don't know what atomic<> is but from the name it's probably exactly
what I was
suggesting.
Trevor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>