From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-23 06:05:17
> Yeah, I don't like them either :-) But I was afraid shorter names
> would have been considered imprecise. If we can bear a little abuse of
> language I think we could accept:
>
> BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE
> BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_TYPE
>
> BOOST_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE
> BOOST_APPEND_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_NON_TYPE
>
>
> If this inspires you any variation, that's welcome too :-)
I quite like those actually :-)
John.