From: James Curran (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-16 09:26:24
Thomas Witt wrote:
> Sorry for being so dumb, but the intent isn't clear to me. What kind
> of ownership semantics should dumb_ptr imply?
I believe he's looking for something along the lines up (modulo this
particular syntax no being allowed yet)
template <typename C>
typedef C* dumb_ptr;
-- Truth, James Curran www.noveltheory.com (personal) www.njtheater.com (professional)