Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Re: why is operator() not const in random number generators?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Brian Gray (briangray_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-15 19:59:38

Next message: chenhong: "[boost] How to use signals lib"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Types and Programming Languages"
In reply to: Jens Maurer: "Re: [boost] Re: why is operator() not const in random number generators?"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] Re: Re: why is operator() not const in random numbergenerators?"

In this discussion it might be worth noting that
boost::random_device::operator() is not const as far as I can see.

-- Brian

Next message: chenhong: "[boost] How to use signals lib"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Types and Programming Languages"
In reply to: Jens Maurer: "Re: [boost] Re: why is operator() not const in random number generators?"
Next in thread: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] Re: Re: why is operator() not const in random numbergenerators?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view