From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-11 22:47:21
Paul Mensonides wrote:
> > That's too bad. But suppose I am willing to spell all non-alphabetic
> > tokens as macros, e.g.
> >
> > BOOST_PP_PLUS text BOOST_PP_PLUS
> >
> > for your above example - would it change anything?
>
> I can deal with that, no problem. However, that makes it worse, IMO.
It depends, IMO. I _think_ I would prefer
METACOMM_FORWARDING_CONSTRUCTORS(
10
, heap_storage
, BOOST_PP_COLON m_object BOOST_PP_PARENS( new T BOOST_PP_PARENS( _1
) )
BOOST_PP_BRACES()
)
// template< typename A0, ..., typename An >
// heap_storage( A0 a0, ..., An an )
// : m_object( new T( unwrap_ref(a0), ..., unwrap_ref(an) ) )
// {}
to this one
METACOMM_FORWARDING_CONSTRUCTORS(
10
, heap_storage
, ( :, m_object, (, new T (, (0), ), ), {,} )
)
The former seems much easier to comprehend even although it's definitely
more verbose. YMMV, of course.
Aleksey