From: Schalk_Cronje_at_[hidden]
Date: 2003-04-09 05:31:26
This therefore means that the license in the file needs to be updated as it is technically in violation of the Boost license requirements as well.
>> Now, I am at odds and ends here as I am not a legal expert, but I am of
>> the opinion that the legal department is wrong in this
>> case. Can someone shed some light on this?
> No, technically they are correct. Improvements and revisions are owned by
> their respective author.
> Unless permission is given, you might only be allowed to use the original
> versions. :-)
> Bo Persson
> bop2_at_[hidden]