From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-09 05:04:26
"Eric Friedman" <ebf_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:b700f5$2at$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> [snip]
> > 2. Does not add support for const types and document how const variant
> could
> > be implemented in specific case. User willing to use variant in generic
> > solution will need to select 'variant'/'variant const' himself.
>
> I'm not sure what this documentation would look like. Perhaps you could
> detail a particular case where you see potential difficulty for the user
and
> we could work from there.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
template<typename T1,typename T2>
struct my_struct
{
boost::variant<T1,T2> m_value;
};
Here if user want to add support for const T1 and T2 he will need to do
something like:
template<typename T1,typename T2>
struct my_struct
{
typedef boost::mpl::if_<boost::is_const<T1>::value,boost::variant<T1,T2>
const,boost::variant<T1,T2> >::type value_type;
value_type m_value;
};
In all other cases one should be able to use variant<> const form of
expression to achieve const variant. These both points worth documenting
IMO.
Gennadiy.