From: Neal D. Becker (nbecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-01 11:07:04
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:09 am, Peter Dimov wrote:
> Neal D. Becker wrote:
> > Here is some more on this problem. Perhaps someone on this list has
> > some ideas where to look? Defining BOOST_NO_THREAD (or whatever it
> > was) will "fix" the problem, but I suspect it's not the correct fix.
> > The code will link OK dynamically, but not statically. That's
> > strange.
>
> I'm not sure how you determine the correctness of the BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS
> fix.
>
If dynamic link works, but static doesn't, something is broken.
I haven't had time to investigate more, but I'll try.