From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-13 08:49:46
At 11:42 AM 3/12/2003, Sam Partington wrote:
>Daniel Frey wrote:
>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>
>>> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
>>> Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
>>
>> We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
>> thus in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the
>> proposal, the branch for 1.30.0 has already happened (IIRC) and to
>> me, this means bug-fixes only. I don't know when exactly you are
>> planning to release
>> 1.30.0, but if there is enough time and Sam (and others) would like to
>> see the addition ASAP, we can try to push things a bit. Currently,
>> it's an 1.31.0 item as far as I'm concerned. Sam, is this OK for you?
>
>Well, I would love to get in 1.30, but I think it may take a little
longer
>that we'd hope. I've just spotted a problem with the private operator
>int()
>implementation which breaks almost every single operators test going! I
>will elaborate when I've done more testing.
>
>So yes, unfortunately, I think we're looking at a 1.31 item.
Daniel and Sam,
I've removed this from the do-list for 1.30.0, but feel free to start
making changes to the CVS main trunk any time you want.
--Beman