From: John Madock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-09 07:41:33
> > Well, I think you're right, but the question remains: what should we
> > do about it? Should we just replace BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME?
>
> That's what I would do. John?
>
> Aleksey
If I remember correcty Dave introduced that macro anyway, so yes go ahead
and change it- can you make sure that the config test case stays up to date
with the changed meaning though?
Thanks,
John.