From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-28 10:55:14
David Abrahams wrote:
> Dave Gomboc <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>>>> So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or
>>>> just managed<>.
>>>
>>> Why not just resource<>? Management is implied anyway; that's the
>>> reason for the existence of the class.
>>
>> *laugh* I was thinking exactly the opposite. To me, the resource
>> itself is clear from the template parameter -- it's the management
>> that needs to be indicated.
>>
>> +1 for managed<>.
>
> I'm with Dave G. on this one. resource<lock> doesn't tell me
> anything; I already know that every lock is a resource.
Yes, but not all resources are locks.
-- Joel de Guzman joel at boost-consulting.com http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net