From: Brian Gray (briangray_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-27 13:01:43
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:15 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> "Sam Partington" <Sam.Partington_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Could it not just be called shared. After all it is merely a more
>> general
>> term of shared_ptr. And the type of the resource kind of makes it
>> implicit.
>
> std::auto_ptr is a non-shared resource manager.
So then reverse resource_manager and get managed_resource<>, or just
managed<>.
-- Brian