From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-14 18:19:51
"Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:1373D6342FA1D4119A5100E029437F6405E1F923_at_clifford.devo.ilx.com...
> [...]
> I could not afford boost::function dependency in so low level
> component as execution_monitor (or even unit_test_monitor). If we
> will be able to design it as pluggable extension to Boost.Test I would
> of course prefer the way you implemented it in Boost.Python with
> boost::function0<void> argument.
> [...]
I second this point. I had a problem with shared_ptr<> visibility in a
policy_ptr test. It would be nice if Boost.Test relied on as few other
libraries as possible.
Dave