From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-11 06:36:56
> Could we subordinate BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG to
> defined(BOOST_ENABLE_LONG_LONG)?
I would rather that BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG was just not defined in the first
place when EDG is in strict mode - any ideas?
John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm