From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-20 13:21:58
At 09:55 AM 1/20/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
>Guillaume Melquiond <gmelquio_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> but before that, something must be decided: where to put the
>> library?
>>
>> This question was already discussed on this mailing-list some times
ago,
>> but no clear answer was given at that time. The library directory is
>> actually directly under boost. To avoid cluttering the root, it would
>> probably be better to put it somewhere else; for example, boost/math or
>> boost/numeric. Unfortunately, the library has some good reasons to be
>> put
>> in each of these directories. So I suggest it is put in boost/numeric
>> (heads or tails).
>>
>> Subsidiary question: should the namespace tree follow the directory
tree?
>> I think it should; but since I will need a few hours to correct the
whole
>> source and documentation (it isn't as easy as changing the #include at
>> the top of the files), I prefer to ask beforehand.
I don't have a strong opinion, but mildly favor boost/numeric with
namespace tree following directory tree.
--Beman