From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-11 22:40:31
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> > I guess it would depend heavily on the compiler used. For instance, a
> > compiler might not actually create the storage at all unless the address
of
> > the static const is actually needed--which would cause the effect to be
> > minimal. On the other hand, unless you mapped all the enumerators of a
> > particular value to the same type, you'd have issues with name lookup.
>
> My proposal with integral_c would do exactly that.
Yes, and I like it. ;) The only thing I don't like about it is the
potential interplay with the rest of the type system. The mapping to a
single type per value is good, but it doesn't completely solve the problem.
I just think it is better to steer clear of the situation altogether. I
personally only use static const for interface values though and use
enumerations for internal values (with casting if necessary).
Paul Mensonides