From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-05 11:26:42
David Abrahams wrote:
>>thought, I am not sure if it's a good choice. Does
>>
>> apply< unarize<F>, list<int,long> >::type
>>
>>convey the discussed meaning for you?
>
>
> No, but I'm not sure that unroll_args does either.
>
> unroll_args doesn't, in fact, unroll arguments. It's a metafunction
> adapter. "Unroll" is usually used with loops, not arguments. But
> that might be the best name we can come up with.
When I did this sort of thing on the runtime side, I called it
"pack/unpack." What about "unpack_args?"
-Dave
-- "Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music, and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson