From: Samuel Krempp (krempp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-12-03 17:09:06
le Mardi 3 Décembre 2002 22:38, gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden] écrivit :
> It's done but not commited yet. I think it will live in test/details for
> couple days until I prepare docs. Is it ok?
sure
>> btw, since it's either wrapping a sstream or simulating one from a
>> strstream, I think something like 'wrap_sstream' is a bit
>> more precise than
>> 'wrapstrstream'.
>
> Ok.
oops, I forgot 'sstream' is the name of the header while the class itself is
named 'stringstream' (a bizarre situation)
wrap_sstream still looks ok to me as a filename, but my arguments were a bit
wrong as I implictly talked about classes, rather than header filenames..
let's say this file wraps the sstream _header_ ..
or you can call it wrap_stringstream. might be best.
-- Samuel