Boost mailing page: [boost] Re: Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-11 12:47:41

Next message: Victor A. Wagner, Jr.: "Re: [boost] boost::array and VC7 (oil & water)"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Bind testing patch for Sun"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Re: Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Re: Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?"

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>We have one in the iterator adaptors library.

Sorry, I'm quite ignorant about that library. What is the workaround
precisely?

Genny.

Next message: Victor A. Wagner, Jr.: "Re: [boost] boost::array and VC7 (oil & water)"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Bind testing patch for Sun"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Re: Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Re: Old Dinkum - does boost have (already) a workaround for this?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view