From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-11-01 21:51:50
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> For my purposes, Doxygen will work fine so I'm not planning on
> giving it up now. (And I have plenty of template code -- not
> meta code, just regular templates see:
> http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/libraries/gdtl/gdtl_ref_guide/classboost_1_1date__time_1_1date.html for example)
I've got to admit, it appears to have a reasonable grasp of what's
happening in your code. I'm not fond of the way things are presented,
but then I've got a lot of complaints with Synopsis in that area as
well.
> And please, if you find bugs with the template handling in a recent
> release of Doxygen be sure to report them. The developer of Doxygen
> is very responsive and helpful in fixing issues. There are regular
> weekly releases for bug fixes and enhancements. And, I'm certainly
> willing to try Synopsis.
It would be interesting to throw Doxygen at Boost.Python and Synopsis
at Boost.DateTime for comparison.
> Let me know when I can download an RPM for Linux and an exe
> installer for windows.
Hey! No fair playing the installation card! ;-)
--
David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com