From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-30 14:33:07
> ... long discussion omitted...
> Eliminating the bug is probably pretty easy for Dmitri. Adding support for
> template parameter information is probably a bit more complicated. But even
You make a couple of good points. These are relevant for regular projects
as well as those that use meta-programming. Did you submit requests for
enhancement? Even if Synopsis works out it would be good to improve
Doxygen as well.
> at that point, the documentation doesn't structure output to handle the
> metafunction above. ReturnType and Apply end up on their own pages. IIRC,
> there aren't even references to it on the MetaPow page, only in the various
> indices and table of contents. Since the two structures above really
> represent a typedef and a member function, the output should be structured
> to view them that way.
I think that support of documentation of meta-programming constructs
is a whole new sort of documentation that is quite distinct in it's
needs since the coding idioms use C++, but not in the 'usual' way.
Jeff