From: Miroslav Silovic (miro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-28 06:28:14
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>To me, the issue is closed because recent measurements showed much better
>numbers at least for static linking.
>
>
I can agree with this sentiment, modulo that the large discrepancy
between the number reported by ls -l and the actual library overhead
should be documented somewhere. :)
Miro