From: Dan Nuffer (dnuffer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-20 23:16:04
Carl Daniel wrote:
> I'm less convinced about illegal_backtracking - I accept your
argument that
> it's intended to be an independent component and so shouldn't derive
from
> parse_error_base, but perhaps it should derive from std::exception.
>
I agree. This is now fixed.
> fixed_size_queue should do _something_. At the very least, it should
> contain assert(false) in the places where a full queue is detected.
>
You're right. I changed it to use SPIRIT_ASSERT, which defaults to
assert if you don't customize it.
Thanks,
Dan