From: Joerg Walter (jhr.walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-04 05:33:08
----- Original Message -----
From: "Toon Knapen" <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: [boost] ublas on mipspro
> There's an ambiguous overload on SGI with ublas (although it works with
gcc,
> icc and vacpp). Also specifying explicitly that here I'm working on a
_const_
> matrix (see last line) did not help. So I'm guessing that this is a
> compiler-problem instead of a coding-problem.
>
>
> cc-1282 CC: ERROR File = /home/fft/tk//femtown/modules/field/patch.hpp,
Line
> = 183
> More than one instance of overloaded function
"boost::numeric::ublas::row"
> matches the argument list.
>
> Function symbol function template
> "boost::numeric::ublas::row(M &, size_t)" is
ambiguous
> by inheritance.
> Function symbol function template
> "boost::numeric::ublas::row(const M &, size_t)" is
> ambiguous by inheritance.
> The argument types are: (const
> boost::numeric::ublas::matrix<FEMTown::Real,
> boost::numeric::ublas::row_major,
>
boost::numeric::ublas::unbounded_array<FEMTown::Real>>,
> FEMTown::Field::Patch<FEMTown::Real>::size_type).
> { for(size_type i = 0 ; begin != end ; ++begin, ++i ) set( *begin,
> numerics::row< const MatrixType >( matrix, i ) ) ; }
This reminds me on MSVC 6.0. I typically use
BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING to disable the const overloads for it.
Are we using the wrong config macro here?
Regards
Joerg