From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-26 06:46:54
From: "Björn Karlsson" <Bjorn.Karlsson_at_[hidden]>
> But doesn't this imply that every use of BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT must be
> followed by a (out-of-class) definition #ifdef:ed with
> BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION? If that's the case, I guess we
need
> a twin macro - BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT_DEFINITION (or just use enums).
Would
> someone enlighten me, please?
Does this help?
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#48
also, for your information:
http://listarchives.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg30039.php
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com