From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-14 17:39:24
From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
> Given the fact that derivation is a no-no, iterator_adaptor is not really
well
> suited for directory_iterator.
Why?
Why not just make directory_iterator a typedef for an iterator_adaptor?
Does it need additional interface beyond that of a standard iterator?
If so, I think it'll have to wait for our new iterator_adaptor design (I
hope sometime early November).
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com