From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-24 07:58:26
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
>
> But I'd like to raise the issue with the whole list. Boost is getting
> bigger. A primary directory, library, namespace, or header, or other
> important name needs to be more explicit than MPL. Acronyms are obscure
> and make a library less accessible to new users.
MPL? Less accessible to new users because of the acronym? ;-)