From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-22 13:18:20
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
> Is there a way to have a thread_specific_ptr that doesn't "delete" the
> pointer when the thread exits?
In the current release this can only be done by creating a wrapper,
unfortunately. The next revision addresses this, as well as a few other
issues, with thread_specific_ptr. I mostly want to apply these Rev2 changes
in one go, so they can be properly reviewed, but thread_specific_ptr has
several things I'd almost consider bug fixes, so maybe I should apply those
changes sooner?
Bill Kempf