From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-15 10:08:03
At 10:34 AM 8/15/2002, Neal D. Becker wrote:
>I think the choice of fstream.hpp for filesystem is going to cause a
>lot of confusion. There is already an <fstream>, and g++ as of 3.1
>still has <fstream.h>.
What would you suggest? Given that <boost/filesystem/fstream.hpp> is a
very thin wrapper of the <fstream> classes, the header name (and matching
namespace and class names) seemed appropriate to me.
But I'm certainly open to other suggestions.
--Beman