From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-12 16:31:19
> > I read somewhere an integer is always the size of a pointer. What about
> a
> > (void *) in the worse case?
>
> You read wrong. Please get a copy of the standard and start studying. It
> isn't fair to push a design that uses low-level hacks here without having
> done at least some of the legwork to come to grips with what is and is not
> conforming.
Yeah, I'll get the standards eventually because they seem a lot more
restrictive than I thought. std::allocator<> looks interesting for pointers
& allocators portability issues...
Philippe A. Bouchard