From: Pete Becker (petebecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-06 11:23:56
At 10:38 AM 8/6/2002 -0500, William E. Kempf wrote:
>This design too was considered and rejected. I think the function object
>design in Boost.Threads is closer to modern C++ design philosophy then the
>artificial inheritance based approach. If you don't agree I'd appreciate
>hearing why?
There is nothing artificial about this use of inheritance. I'm really not
interested in participating in a discussion that consists of slinging
around loaded terms devoid of technical content.
-- Pete
Dinkumware, Ltd.
"Genuine Software"