From: Ron Garcia (garcia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-20 14:24:20
David Abrahams wrote:
>Ron Garcia wrote:
>
>
>>I think "metafunctions" is adequate, but "metafunction classes" seems
>>fine as well.
>>
>>
>
>Those are separate concepts. A simple C++ metafunction looks like this:
>
>
Ahh. I was thinking more that MPL supplies metafunctions (i.e.
apply_if), but the sentence is referring to the framework, which seems
to focus more on the metafunction classes than metafunctions.
ron