From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-12 05:11:33
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin_at_[hidden]>
> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > #include <limits.h>
> > # if !defined(BOOST_MSVC) && !defined(__BORLANDC__) \
> > && (defined(ULLONG_MAX) || defined(ULONG_LONG_MAX) ||
> > defined(ULONGLONG_MAX))
> > # define BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG
> > #endif
> [...]
> > I'm surprised it wasn't a
> > worse problem with MSVC6, because after all, it doesn't even supply a
type
> > called "long long".
>
> Could that have resulted from defining BOOST_MSVC?
Sorry, I don't understand the question. Could *what* have resulted from
defining BOOST_MSVC?
-Dave