Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 12:00:20

From: "Greg Colvin" <greg_at_[hidden]>

> >I think 'c_ptr' would be a very good choice.
> 
> And I still like &*p better than p.get() or mumble_ptr(p).

Causes undefined behavior if p is a null pointer, though. :(