From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes (larsbj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-11 12:04:44
"David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> writes:
| From: "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" <larsbj_at_[hidden]>
>
>> When testing this and the prev. version with gcc, I get a 2:3
>> perfomance difference in favour of the traditional solution.
>>
>> Gcc 3.1 -O3
>> ./postincr
>> Number1: 6650000
>> Number2: 9900000
>
| That's not surprising. What happens when you try the version that actually
| returns the postfix_incrementer<number> instead of the number?
No difference.
-- Lgb