From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-17 10:05:20
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:007a01c1fd8b$ef7b20f0$1d00a8c0_at_pdimov2...
> [...] Now one can unleash the "smart pointer theory" on the problem. ;-)
Heh, heh...the "smart pointer theory"...now I feel like we're doing physics.
;)
> [...] It isn't a move semantics showcase IMHO [...]
After hearing Bill's opinion of shared locks, do you think that move
semantics are more appropriate, or that there is a better alternative?
Dave