From: Dave Harris (brangdon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-19 08:16:20
In-Reply-To: <904AA220ACB4D211A10600104B3E85C92A82C7_at_MAIL>
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:14:54 +0200 (DKl_at_[hidden]) wrote:
> I think that something like this can be achieved in a form which
> requires configuration of [root] base classes only
I hope we don't lose the ability to write:
class Impl;
smart_ptr<Impl> pImpl;
In other words, smart pointers to incomplete types. We may not know what
Impl's base class is.
-- Dave Harris