From: boost (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-18 13:53:49
Salut Jörg,
On Thursday 18 April 2002 00:31, Joerg Walter wrote:
> OTOH, in a generic algorithm one shouldn't care to use a matrix container
> or a matrix view. May be, the main question is: what do you need to achieve
> with matrix::swap?
function( matrix& Q)
{
size_t size1 = ...
size_t size1 = ...
matrix WorkSpace( size1, size2 );
WorkSpace = .... some Operations involving Q
Q.swap( WorkSpace);
}
of course I could avoid using swap by assigning the workspace, but
it would be more expensive with respect to memory allocation and unneccessary
copies.
Best wishes,
Peter
P.S. Since yesterday I have a minimal working version of my project.
Therefore I will start implementing all the things I've promised, since I'll
need it. ( DiffAri, LapackForUblas, ... )