From: j.adelman_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-04-16 04:33:00
Quoting Andrei Alexandrescu
<andrewalex_at_[hidden]>:
> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote
in message
> news:00a401c1e501$7f4d60b0
$6501a8c0_at_boostconsulting.com...
> > > BTW, I didn't notice whether David caught
this one up - a couple
> of
> > > code samples use implicit int throughout.
> >
> > do you mean that functions fail to declare a
return type?
>
> No, there are some "unsigned"s not followed
by "int".
>
> Andrei
Why is that a problem? It is permitted and
unambiguous, no more problematic than using long
to mean long int.
James
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through UK Online webmail